From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Feb 01 08:37:25 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 1 Feb 2003 16:37:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 14572 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2003 16:37:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 1 Feb 2003 16:37:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2003 16:37:25 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18f0dw-0006EX-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 01 Feb 2003 08:37:24 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18f0dD-0006Dw-00; Sat, 01 Feb 2003 08:36:39 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 01 Feb 2003 08:36:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18f0d5-0006Dn-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2003 08:36:31 -0800
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 08:36:31 -0800
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Ungrammatical examples in CLL
Message-ID: <20030201163631.GD13520@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302011458530.25480-100000@thedave.homelinux.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302011458530.25480-100000@thedave.homelinux.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
X-archive-position: 3973
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 03:25:37PM +0000, Martin Bays wrote:
> Further to the problems with prenex-connective interaction -
> 
> 16.10.5:
> roda zo'u mi prami da .ije naku zo'u do prami da
> 
> and 16.10.6:
> su'oda zo'u mi prami da .ije naku zo'u do prami da
> 
> do not parse. Try them on jbofihe. You can use ge...gi instead, and
> that seems fine, but (as I mentioned the other day) it looks like you
> can't have individually prenexed sentences connected in afterthought.
> 
> Damned annoying, if you ask me.

For the record, jbofi'e has been shown to have errors before.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
.i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu
.i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai
http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi




