From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Feb 03 10:08:28 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 3 Feb 2003 18:08:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 87906 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2003 18:08:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Feb 2003 18:08:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Feb 2003 18:08:28 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18fl1A-0004Q4-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 10:08:28 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18fl17-0004Pi-00; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 10:08:25 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 03 Feb 2003 10:08:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18fl0z-0004PV-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 10:08:17 -0800
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:08:17 -0800
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: broda brode ==? brode co broda
Message-ID: <20030203180817.GC13520@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <C9A98F2128EDD411B0920008C7B337A13DD0BF@hamsem01.de.gedas.vwg>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C9A98F2128EDD411B0920008C7B337A13DD0BF@hamsem01.de.gedas.vwg>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
X-archive-position: 3992
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:47:59AM +0100, Newton, Philip wrote:
> Is {ko'a broda brode} (with no further places filled), in general,
> identical in meaning to {ko'a brode co broda}? In other words, does
> tanru inversion with {co} result in the same meaning?

Except for emphasis, yes.

-Robin, who may be wrong, but the fastest way to get corrected is to
state a wrong answer. 8)

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
.i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu
.i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai
http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi




