From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Feb 03 15:48:44 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 3 Feb 2003 23:48:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 7717 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2003 23:48:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Feb 2003 23:48:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Feb 2003 23:48:44 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18fqKR-0006qu-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 15:48:43 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18fqKM-0006qb-00; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 15:48:38 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 03 Feb 2003 15:48:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18fqKF-0006qN-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 15:48:31 -0800 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 15:48:31 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: What about obscuring addresses in the mailing-list archives? Message-ID: <20030203234831.GU20552@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030203210316.GH20552@digitalkingdom.org> <7A7F9708-37D0-11D7-9DA8-003065E00134@altern.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7A7F9708-37D0-11D7-9DA8-003065E00134@altern.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-archive-position: 4004 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 12:37:37AM +0100, jexOm. wrote: > coi. rodo .i mi'e jexom. > > Let's go for this discussion... > > Robin has created an archive for the two mailing-lists, which is a > very good thing, thanks a lot Robin. > > In these archives, e-mail addresses are not obscured (as they are in > YahooGroups archives for example). I think it would be a good idea to > do the same thing. Below are excerpts of a discussion I had with > Robin. Robin prefers to leave the addresses in clear. My reasons: 1. I hate going through archives and not being able to mail the author of an article directly. 2. If you, or your ISP, don't have a good spam filter at this point, well, I'm inclined to say you're not paying attention. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi