From phma@webjockey.net Mon Feb 03 15:52:52 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 3 Feb 2003 23:52:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 63867 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2003 23:52:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Feb 2003 23:52:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Feb 2003 23:52:51 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18fqOQ-0006yx-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 15:52:50 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18fqON-0006yd-00; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 15:52:47 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 03 Feb 2003 15:52:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18fqOG-0006xO-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 15:52:40 -0800 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6437B905B; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 23:52:15 +0000 (UTC) Organization: dis To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: What about obscuring addresses in the mailing-list archives? Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 18:52:14 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <7A7F9708-37D0-11D7-9DA8-003065E00134@altern.org> In-Reply-To: <7A7F9708-37D0-11D7-9DA8-003065E00134@altern.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200302031852.14927.phma@webjockey.net> X-archive-position: 4005 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Pierre Abbat Reply-To: phma@webjockey.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 On Monday 03 February 2003 18:37, jexOm. wrote: > coi. rodo .i mi'e jexom. > > Let's go for this discussion... > > Robin has created an archive for the two mailing-lists, which is a very > good thing, thanks a lot Robin. > > In these archives, e-mail addresses are not obscured (as they are in > YahooGroups archives for example). I think it would be a good idea to > do the same thing. Below are excerpts of a discussion I had with Robin. > Robin prefers to leave the addresses in clear. > > What do you think? I hope this won't start a too long thread... mi pilno la reizr. lenu fespu'i loi fesyselmri .ija'ebo so'u da fesyselmri fi mi .i.au lei mrijudri cu se jarco tezu'e lo'enu mi se xatra lo notci be la lojban mu'omi'e pier.