From phma@webjockey.net Fri Feb 07 13:55:25 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 7 Feb 2003 21:55:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 98101 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2003 21:55:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Feb 2003 21:55:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Feb 2003 21:55:25 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18hGSy-0000kV-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 07 Feb 2003 13:55:24 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18hGSn-0000jp-00; Fri, 07 Feb 2003 13:55:13 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 07 Feb 2003 13:55:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18hGSh-0000jd-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2003 13:55:07 -0800
Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001)
  id 91D0129B3; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 21:54:44 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: dis
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Language Names, please.
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:54:44 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
References: <20030205220821.GJ13069@digitalkingdom.org> <200302052001.01080.phma@webjockey.net> <20030206190148.GF16074@digitalkingdom.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030206190148.GF16074@digitalkingdom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200302071654.44157.phma@webjockey.net>
X-archive-position: 4052
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
Reply-To: phma@webjockey.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300

On Thursday 06 February 2003 14:01, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 08:01:00PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > kymraig. I don't think Welsh should have a gismu, and I'm not sure what
> > to do about the 'y' when making a brivla, but there should be a brivla so
> > that we can speak about a Welsh broda.
>
> I really need a brivla in this case. Comments, anyone?

I thought of {kamraigo}, but that breaks up, but {mraigo} is of the official 
experimental rafsi fu'ivla form. If not {mraigo}, {bangrkamri}.

phma