From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Feb 08 00:32:45 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 8 Feb 2003 08:32:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 58888 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2003 08:32:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Feb 2003 08:32:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Feb 2003 08:32:44 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18hQPk-0005UG-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:32:44 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18hQPc-0005Tu-00; Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:32:36 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:32:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18hQPO-0005Tb-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:32:22 -0800
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 00:32:22 -0800
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] sumtcita needed, badly.
Message-ID: <20030208083222.GB16074@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
X-archive-position: 4058
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

I can't even count the number of times in conversational lojban that
I've wanted a sumtcita for *any* word that has a 'topic' or 'subject of
discussion' sort of place.

It's also pretty sad that there's no analogue to cusku with a subject
place i.e. expression on a topic. cusku requires actual *text* in the
second place, which just blows my mind; I can't think of any reason for
that.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
.i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu
.i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai
http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi




