From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Feb 08 06:32:40 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 8 Feb 2003 14:32:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 62975 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2003 14:32:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Feb 2003 14:32:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Feb 2003 14:32:40 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18hW23-0000t0-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 08 Feb 2003 06:32:39 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18hW1r-0000sF-00; Sat, 08 Feb 2003 06:32:27 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 08 Feb 2003 06:32:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18hW1b-0000rl-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2003 06:32:11 -0800
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h18Edc0h000160
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 08:39:38 -0600 (CST)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h18EdZZC000157
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 08:39:35 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 08:39:35 -0600
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: sumtcita needed, badly.
Message-ID: <20030208143935.GA99931@allusion.net>
References: <20030208083222.GB16074@digitalkingdom.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302080941160.2380-100000@thedave.homelinux.org> <20030208105312.GD16074@digitalkingdom.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030208105312.GD16074@digitalkingdom.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-archive-position: 4064
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:53:13AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 09:50:44AM +0000, Martin Bays wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> >=20
> > > I can't even count the number of times in conversational lojban that
> > > I've wanted a sumtcita for *any* word that has a 'topic' or 'subject
> > > of discussion' sort of place.
> > >
> > > It's also pretty sad that there's no analogue to cusku with a
> > > subject place i.e. expression on a topic. cusku requires actual
> > > *text* in the second place, which just blows my mind; I can't think
> > > of any reason for that.
> > >
> >=20
> > cusku can also take a sedu'u abstraction,
>=20
> I've *never* understood sedu'u, but I *think* it wants literal text.

sedu'u is how you use it without literal text. You can also use
lu'elu ... li'u.

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+RRanDrrilS51AZ8RAleDAKDSwJSGqtT8/wptvgbrxcjwjoz+ogCeJ8Bs
HVkNnTDVtPZmCsVCEQhXpmU=
=3oh8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu--

