From ragnarok@pobox.com Mon Feb 24 18:46:15 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 25 Feb 2003 02:46:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 26302 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2003 02:46:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Feb 2003 02:46:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2003 02:46:10 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18nV6g-0005jf-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 18:46:10 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18nV66-0005j7-00; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 18:45:34 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 24 Feb 2003 18:45:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.intrex.net ([209.42.192.250]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18nV5z-0005iu-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 18:45:27 -0800 Received: from craig [209.42.200.67] by smtp.intrex.net (SMTPD32-7.13) id A8A84FD006A; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 21:44:56 -0500 To: Subject: [lojban] Re: jbovlaste issues Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 21:45:03 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20030225021759.GO21342@digitalkingdom.org> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Declude-Sender: ragnarok@pobox.com [209.42.200.67] X-archive-position: 4139 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ragnarok@pobox.com Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: "Craig" Reply-To: ragnarok@pobox.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382 X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl >> >Nick has decided that it will be the basis used for the BPFK's >> >official dictionary. He'll announce that at some point. >> >> Speaking of which: >> Why hasn't anything happened with the bpfk? >Well, Nick's been travelling, for one thing. >But we've got some basic infrastructure set up, and I hear tell a lot of >the issues are being hackup up on jboske. Some of us (me, and I know a few others exist though I can't remember names) have no intention of joining jboske, but I at least did answer the call for bpfk members. Therefore, jboske is *not* the place for such discussions.