From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Feb 24 19:20:33 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 25 Feb 2003 03:20:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 73627 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2003 03:20:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Feb 2003 03:20:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2003 03:20:33 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18nVdw-0005wG-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:20:32 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18nVdM-0005vi-00; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:19:56 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:19:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18nVdE-0005vY-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:19:48 -0800
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:19:48 -0800
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: jbovlaste issues
Message-ID: <20030225031948.GQ21342@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20030225021759.GO21342@digitalkingdom.org> <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFGEMJDAAA.ragnarok@pobox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFGEMJDAAA.ragnarok@pobox.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
X-archive-position: 4140
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 09:45:03PM -0500, Craig wrote:
> >> >Nick has decided that it will be the basis used for the BPFK's
> >> >official dictionary. He'll announce that at some point.
> >>
> >> Speaking of which: Why hasn't anything happened with the bpfk?
> 
> >Well, Nick's been travelling, for one thing.
> 
> >But we've got some basic infrastructure set up, and I hear tell a lot
> >of the issues are being hackup up on jboske.
> 
> Some of us (me, and I know a few others exist though I can't remember
> names) have no intention of joining jboske, but I at least did answer
> the call for bpfk members. Therefore, jboske is *not* the place for
> such discussions.

Oh, I completely agree; I refuse to join jboske as well.

But that doesn't change the fact that such discussions have been
happening there.

Nick wanted a certain kind of infrastructure; he had trouble
communication to me exactly what he wanted until he visited. So things
should start up soon.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
.i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu
.i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai
http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi




