From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Feb 24 19:26:17 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 25 Feb 2003 03:26:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 87496 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2003 03:26:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Feb 2003 03:26:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2003 03:26:16 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18nVjU-0005zd-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:26:16 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18nViu-0005z9-00; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:25:40 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:25:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18nVin-0005yu-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:25:33 -0800
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:25:33 -0800
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: jbovlaste issues
Message-ID: <20030225032533.GR21342@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20030225004207.GM21342@digitalkingdom.org> <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFIEMIDAAA.ragnarok@pobox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFIEMIDAAA.ragnarok@pobox.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
X-archive-position: 4141
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 09:14:17PM -0500, Craig wrote:
> >Nick has decided that it will be the basis used for the BPFK's
> >official dictionary. He'll announce that at some point.
> 
> Speaking of which: Why hasn't anything happened with the bpfk?

Another answer to your question:

No-one but me offered to do any actual *work* to help set up a
discussion board to meet Nick's requirements, that's what happened.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
.i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu
.i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai
http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi




