From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Wed Feb 26 12:49:27 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 26 Feb 2003 20:49:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 86560 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 20:49:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 26 Feb 2003 20:49:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Feb 2003 20:49:26 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18o8UX-0002Rn-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:49:25 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18o8UA-0002RU-00; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:49:02 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:49:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from lmsmtp01.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.111]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18o8U2-0002RF-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:48:54 -0800 Received: from oemcomputer (host81-7-54-66.surfport24.v21.co.uk [81.7.54.66]) by lmsmtp01.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821641E7A6 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 21:48:22 +0100 (MET) To: Subject: [lojban] Re: jbovlaste issues Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:48:21 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-archive-position: 4161 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: "And Rosta" Reply-To: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin Craig: > >But we've got some basic infrastructure set up, and I hear tell a lot of > >the issues are being hackup up on jboske > > Some of us (me, and I know a few others exist though I can't remember names) > have no intention of joining jboske, but I at least did answer the call for > bpfk members. Therefore, jboske is *not* the place for such discussions Jboske is the forum for technical discussion of Lojban, the BF forum is for taking decisions about what amendments to the baseline the BF should recommend. Most of those decisions require prior technical discussion, so anyone wanting to be party to that discuss should join jboske. --And.