From ragnarok@pobox.com Wed Feb 26 13:01:32 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 26 Feb 2003 21:01:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 86515 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 21:01:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 26 Feb 2003 21:01:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Feb 2003 21:01:31 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18o8gF-0002WX-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:01:31 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18o8g6-0002WE-00; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:01:22 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:01:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.intrex.net ([209.42.192.250]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18o8fz-0002W3-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:01:15 -0800 Received: from craig [209.42.200.67] by smtp.intrex.net (SMTPD32-7.13) id AAF919310152; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:00:41 -0500 To: Subject: [lojban] Re: jbovlaste issues Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:00:56 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-Declude-Sender: ragnarok@pobox.com [209.42.200.67] X-archive-position: 4163 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ragnarok@pobox.com Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: "Craig" Reply-To: ragnarok@pobox.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382 X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl >> >But we've got some basic infrastructure set up, and I hear tell a lot of >> >the issues are being hackup up on jboske >> >> Some of us (me, and I know a few others exist though I can't remember names) >> have no intention of joining jboske, but I at least did answer the call for >> bpfk members. Therefore, jboske is *not* the place for such discussions >Jboske is the forum for technical discussion of Lojban, the BF forum >is for taking decisions about what amendments to the baseline the BF >should recommend. Most of those decisions require prior technical >discussion, so anyone wanting to be party to that discuss should >join jboske. As I have said, my complaint came from a misreading of Robin as implying that jboske was making decisions. The bpfk should make any decisions that must be made, and will. Jboske should discuss, and does.