From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Feb 26 14:35:09 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 26 Feb 2003 22:35:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 33651 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 22:35:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 26 Feb 2003 22:35:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Feb 2003 22:35:09 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18oA8r-0003Z1-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:35:09 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18oA8l-0003Yd-00; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:35:03 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:35:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18oA8d-0003YO-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:34:55 -0800
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:34:55 -0800
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: species in jbovlaste
Message-ID: <20030226223455.GB17377@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <200302262203.06372.phma@webjockey.net> <20030226215155.GV17377@digitalkingdom.org> <200302262332.22949.phma@webjockey.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200302262332.22949.phma@webjockey.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
X-archive-position: 4170
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 11:32:22PM +0100, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 February 2003 22:51, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:03:06PM +0100, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > > There are going to be thousands of brivla whose x2 is a species of
> > > something. (I just added two.) How should these be handled?
> >
> > I don't think I understand the question. You seem to have already
> > figured out how to add the words, so...
> 
> Should x2 be "species" or "species of gambier/peacock/walrus" or
> "gambier/peacock/walrus species" or omitted? Putting "species" will
> result in a definition for "species" that's at least a dozen pages;
> putting "gambier etc. species" will result in lots of extra entries;
> omitting them means that all dictionary users will have to know that
> all animal, plant, and fungus names have the species as x2.

You mean what should the gloss word for the x2 place be, right?

> My opinion is that it should be omitted except for higher taxa and
> sheep-eating tigers. Anyone who's been in Bertcad Mivdal knows that x2
> of an animal is its species.

I'm inclined to agree, even though I don't know what Bertcad Midval is.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
.i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu
.i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai
http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi




