From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Feb 26 16:10:44 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 27 Feb 2003 00:10:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 91215 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 00:10:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 27 Feb 2003 00:10:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 00:10:44 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18oBdL-0004k2-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:10:43 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18oBdD-0004jh-00; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:10:35 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:10:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18oBcq-0004jR-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:10:12 -0800 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:10:12 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Nick will be with you shortly Message-ID: <20030227001011.GF16549@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030226233657.GE17377@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-archive-position: 4182 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 06:59:41PM -0500, Craig wrote: > However, if no reason is ever given why an idea is a Solution to a > Problem (as opposed to a Random Act of Tinkering), I will treat it as > being in the RTA group rather than the SP group. I wouldn't insist on > the explanation of the problem being in the proposal (although I think > it would be a Good Thing Deserving of Kudos if it were); I would > merely insist that the explanation of the problem not be nonexistant. > Discussion on the list is sufficient, but future lojbanists would want > to see our reasoning - and it should be readily accessible. Completely agreed. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi