From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Feb 27 18:00:37 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 28 Feb 2003 02:00:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 63084 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2003 02:00:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Feb 2003 02:00:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Feb 2003 02:00:34 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18oZpC-0004gA-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:00:34 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18oZp8-0004fr-00; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:00:30 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:00:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18oZp1-0004fi-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:00:23 -0800 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h1S26sbE008494 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:06:54 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h1S26rhf008493 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:06:53 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:06:53 -0600 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Any (was: Nick will be with you shortly) Message-ID: <20030228020653.GA8462@allusion.net> References: <200302272338.28613.phma@webjockey.net> <20030228011506.GA7457@allusion.net> <200302280253.20163.phma@webjockey.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200302280253.20163.phma@webjockey.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-archive-position: 4206 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong From: Jordan DeLong Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 02:53:20AM +0100, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Friday 28 February 2003 02:15, Jordan DeLong wrote: > > That was xod's argument. "lo da'icu'i mikce", etc. > > > > However this still doesn't solve the problem. "lo mikce" has to > > be the same as "da poi mikce". "I need some doctor" or "There is > > a doctor that I need". It cannot do "I need any doctor". >=20 > Okay. Let's expand it: > mi nitcu tu'a lo mikce [...] Let me stop you right there. Who said anything about tu'a? Yes you can do Any with tu'a. Nick mentioned that lojban assumes propositionalism in his last mail. But that's not what we were discussing. --=20 Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+XsQ9DrrilS51AZ8RAl7kAKCCDILtv4gbXqL/j0c0Q7F+s/dX5ACeORoO iGp94N8Qa1HygtS8lFmIwmE= =CY+4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z--