From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Feb 28 07:12:59 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 28 Feb 2003 15:12:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 23619 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2003 15:12:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Feb 2003 15:12:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Feb 2003 15:12:53 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18omBx-0006PG-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:12:53 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18omBf-0006NR-00; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:12:35 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:12:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhc27.chch.ox.ac.uk
  ([163.1.237.27] helo=thedave ident=0)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18omBN-0006MJ-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:12:17 -0800
Received: from thedave.homelinux.org (IDENT:1001@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by thedave (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h1SFCpK7005721
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:12:51 GMT
Received: from localhost (martin@localhost)
  by thedave.homelinux.org (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) with ESMTP id h1SFCovC005718
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:12:51 GMT
X-Authentication-Warning: thedave.homelinux.org: martin owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:12:50 +0000 (GMT)
X-X-Sender: martin@thedave.homelinux.org
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Any (was: Nick will be with you shortly)
In-Reply-To: <20030228143808.GA29375@allusion.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302281502030.1536-100000@thedave.homelinux.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-archive-position: 4216
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: mbays@freeshell.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Martin Bays <mbays@freeshell.org>
From: Martin Bays <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: mbays@freeshell.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Jordan DeLong wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 12:59:32AM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Jordan DeLong wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 09:39:07PM -0500, Craig wrote:
> [...]
> > > > If "mi nitcu lo mikce" means that I need a doctor, but that there is no
> > > > specific doctor that I need, then I need any doctor. If that's not what Any
> > > > means to you, then perhaps you could define it for us to better demonstrate
> > > > what your problem is.
> > >
> > > If
> > > la bab. nitcu la djan.
> > > and
> > > la djan. mikce
> > > then one can infer that
> > > la bab. nitcu lo mikce
> > > But you can't infer
> > > la bab. nitcu <Any> mikce
> > > (something like la bab. nitcu ledu'u da mikce vo'a, except that
> > > you can't do that).
> > >
[...]
>
> > Your understanding of the English word "any" is not shared by me and
> > Craig, for whom "any" means nonspecific. You seem to think that "any" is
> > somehow specific. Or something. Anyway, Craig's narrowing process,
> > starting with da (any thing), and narrowing down to da poi mikce (any
> > thing that is a doctor) is canonical, and must be refuted if there are any
> > objections.
>
> Any is not specific. "I need a doctor" (which is Any) says nothing
> about which doctor, doesn't assert the existence of such a doctor,
> and doesn't suggest that some doctors may suffice and other doctors
> may not.
>

Oh dear. If I've understood your meaning of "any" correctly - you need a
doctor, and what's more you need a doctor precisely because of its
doctorishness, and don't care about specific identity or other properties
- then this is precisely the kind of circumstance in which I'd use lo'e.
I need "the typical" doctor - I need "the result of squinting over the set
of all things which doctor".

I'm guessing that's wrong. Anyone feel like explaining why?

Thanks,

Martin

---

la lojban. zo'u .e'inai ro'e





