From xod@thestonecutters.net Fri Feb 28 10:44:34 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 28 Feb 2003 18:44:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 35877 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2003 18:44:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Feb 2003 18:44:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Feb 2003 18:44:32 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18opUm-0003bA-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:44:32 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18opUD-0003aZ-00; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:43:57 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:43:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18opSr-0003Zw-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:42:34 -0800 Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1SIgXh07363 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:42:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:42:33 -0500 (EST) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Any (was: Nick will be with you shortly) In-Reply-To: <20030228180623.GP17252@digitalkingdom.org> Message-ID: <20030228134141.S4979-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 4233 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Invent Yourself Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 09:23:55PM -0500, Craig wrote: > > mi nitcu da. Let's start with that. Do you at least agree that there > > isn't a specific thing which I mean that I need? > > Absolutely not. > > mi nitcu da == There exists an X such that I need it. > > X could be *VERY* specific. Say the x3 of nitcu is le nu cikre le mi > karce poi finti de'i li pa so no ze ... Great, five posts in a row all expressing the same idea. So, you think da is specific, do you? I can't work with you. Carry on. -- What would Jesus bomb?