From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Feb 28 19:34:48 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 1 Mar 2003 03:34:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 84407 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2003 03:34:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 1 Mar 2003 03:34:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Mar 2003 03:34:48 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18oxlw-0002Co-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:34:48 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18oxlU-0002CR-00; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:34:20 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:34:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18oxlN-0002CD-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:34:13 -0800 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:34:13 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Any (was: Nick will be with you shortly) Message-ID: <20030301033413.GC7560@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030228215015.GC17252@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-archive-position: 4253 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:27:10PM -0500, Craig wrote: > >Note, however, that the original discussion was about nitcu, with the > >x3 unspecified. That makes *all* the difference to me. > > Therefore the scope of da is limited to the mikce that are acceptable > with your ternitcu. However, you do not explain why the unspecified > ternitcu makes the difference from 'any doctor' to 'the doctor I have > in mind'. Actually, I have. Several times. What if the unspecified ternitcu is "le nu cikre le mi besna"? "Any doctor" is most likely *not* a brain surgeon. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi