From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Mar 03 04:07:33 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 3 Mar 2003 12:07:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 97595 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2003 12:07:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Mar 2003 12:07:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Mar 2003 12:07:32 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18pojE-0000YH-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 04:07:32 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18poj6-0000Xw-00; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 04:07:24 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 03 Mar 2003 04:07:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp02.wlv.untd.com ([209.247.163.58]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 18poit-0000Xn-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 04:07:11 -0800 Received: (qmail 25421 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2003 12:07:05 -0000 Received: from dialup-209.246.68.54.dial1.newyork1.level3.net (HELO vr00m.net) (209.246.68.54) by smtp02.wlv.untd.com with SMTP; 3 Mar 2003 12:07:05 -0000 Message-ID: <3E634561.3050004@vr00m.net> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 07:06:57 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: [Announcement] jbovlaste 0.7 References: <20030303051126.GO7560@digitalkingdom.org> <20030303060800.GP7560@digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20030303060800.GP7560@digitalkingdom.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.73.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-archive-position: 4287 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: skorgu@vr00m.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: skorgu From: skorgu Reply-To: skorgu@vr00m.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Without making a whole load of work, how complicated would it be to add another, parallel definition set? To clarify: I think lojban would be very useful as a language for querying the (admittedly poorly documented) emerging standards of RDF-based ontologies and whatever semantic web is built around them. I would like to be able to have an ontology->lojban correspondance table side-by-side with the regular lojban -> natlang translations/parsings/glossings/wawa. If this would be an absurd amount of work, don't bother. There's no reason that this kind of thing needs to be done in jbovlaste, but it seems to me that having the correspondances somewhat open to group effort and discussion would benefit the language. - --Patrick -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE+Y0VhjxlO/uCfO6MRAmDcAKDRjtG2LMcGlUYk5nE1+oO4wrY0pQCfQGOF pcop5AnygvMbzt0jBFoHxrE= =V2el -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----