From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Mar 03 08:25:34 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 3 Mar 2003 16:25:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 96125 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2003 16:25:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Mar 2003 16:25:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Mar 2003 16:25:33 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18psku-0006yQ-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 08:25:32 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18pske-0006wI-00; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 08:25:16 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 03 Mar 2003 08:25:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from express.cec.wustl.edu ([128.252.21.16]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18pskL-0006ul-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 08:24:58 -0800 Received: from ritz.cec.wustl.edu (ritz.cec.wustl.edu [128.252.21.2]) by express.cec.wustl.edu (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h23GOtfO012144 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:24:56 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <200303031624.h23GOtfO012144@express.cec.wustl.edu> To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: [Announcement] jbovlaste 0.7 References: <20030303051126.GO7560@digitalkingdom.org> <20030303060800.GP7560@digitalkingdom.org> <3E634561.3050004@vr00m.net> In-reply-to: <3E634561.3050004@vr00m.net> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 10:24:54 -0600 X-archive-position: 4297 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: adam@cec.wustl.edu Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Adam Lopresto From: Adam Lopresto Reply-To: adam@cec.wustl.edu X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out It looks like it already accepts definitions in a whole mabla-load of languages, so I wonder whether there could be created a pseudo-language for the RDF definitions. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > Without making a whole load of work, how complicated would it be to add > another, parallel definition set? > > To clarify: I think lojban would be very useful as a language for querying > the (admittedly poorly documented) emerging standards of RDF-based ontologies > and whatever semantic web is built around them. I would like to be able to > have an ontology->lojban correspondance table side-by-side with the regular > lojban -> natlang translations/parsings/glossings/wawa. > > If this would be an absurd amount of work, don't bother. There's no reason > that this kind of thing needs to be done in jbovlaste, but it seems to me > that having the correspondances somewhat open to group effort and discussion > would benefit the language. > > - --Patrick -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQE+Y0VhjxlO/uCfO6MRAmDcAKDRjtG2LMcGlUYk5nE1+oO4wrY0pQCfQGOF > pcop5AnygvMbzt0jBFoHxrE= =V2el -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- Adam Lopresto (adam@cec.wustl.edu) http://cec.wustl.edu/~adam/ Never commit yourself. Let someone else commit you.