From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Mar 03 15:14:20 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 3 Mar 2003 23:14:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 73110 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2003 23:14:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Mar 2003 23:14:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Mar 2003 23:14:19 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18pz8V-00038v-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 15:14:19 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18pz8L-00038c-00; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 15:14:09 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 03 Mar 2003 15:14:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr ([139.179.30.24])
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18pz8D-00038G-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 15:14:02 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7873200E
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 01:13:28 +0200 (EET)
Received: from bilkent.edu.tr (ppp115.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr [139.179.111.115])
  by manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6CE2F4F1
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 01:13:25 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <3E63E200.8080300@bilkent.edu.tr>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 01:15:12 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: The Any thread
References: <20030303164408.X38820-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020531
X-archive-position: 4306
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: robin@bilkent.edu.tr
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: robin <robin@bilkent.edu.tr>
From: robin <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: robin@bilkent.edu.tr
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

Invent Yourself wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, jjllambias2000 <jjllambias@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Suppose that the folllowing are all true:
>>
>>la meris pendo la djan noi mikce
>>la meris na pendo la fred noi mikce
>>la meris na pendo la alis noi mikce
>>
>>Can we assert, based on that info, that:
>>
>> la meris pendo lo mikce
>>
>>? Yes, Mary is friend to at least one doctor, namely
>>John. That of course does not mean that Mary is friend to
>>any doctor.
> 
> "Is Mary the friend of any doctor at all? Does she have any friends who
> are doctors?"
> 
> "Why, yes, she is the friend of a doctor."
> 
>>If someone asks:
>>
>> xu la meris pendo lo mikce
>>
>>We have to answer {go'i}, she is the friend of at
>>least one doctor.

> How one can be a friend to a nonspecific doctor is hard to imagine.

Quite. The difference is not in the usage of {lo} but in the semantics 
of {nitcu} and {pendo}. I can need a non-specific doctor, because I can 
have a need for a doctor even if there are no doctors left in the world. 
However, I cannot be a friend to a doctor without there being a doctor 
for me to be a friend to.

> 
>>That again does not at all mean that
>>Mary needs any doctor, all we are saying is that there
>>is at least one that she needs.
>>
>>The way Xod and Craig want to use {lo} is not how it has
>>been defined, but there certainly is a need for that other
>>meaning. I use {lo'e} for that other meaning, but I would
>>favour changing {lo} for that function, because it is
>>very frequent and basic. That would change the meaning
>>of {la meris pendo lo mikce} to "Mary is friendly to doctors",
>>a generic statement, rather than the concrete meaning "Mary
>>is friend to at least one doctor" that it has now.
> 
> lo'e is a little heavy-handed. It achieves its nonspecificity by stripping
> all distinction away from the doctors. "friendly to doctors" doesn't
> necessarily apply to nontypical doctors, whereas lo mikce does include
> them
> 
"Mary is friendly to doctors" may best be expressed by a quantifier, 
e.g. {la meris. pendo so'e lo mikce} (allowing that there are probably a 
few doctors who really piss her off). But that raises the question of 
whether it is necessary to add the qualification {poi ke'a penmi ra} or 
whether pragmatics dictate that since Mary cannot be a friend of 
doctors she doesn't know, so it's unnecessary.

robin.tr

-- 
"The raisins may be the best part of a cake, but that doesn't
mean that a bag of raisins is better than a cake."
- Wittgenstein

Robin Turner
IDMYO
Bilkent Univeritesi
Ankara 06533
Turkey

www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin






