From ragnarok@pobox.com Mon Mar 03 16:04:54 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 4 Mar 2003 00:04:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 23667 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2003 00:04:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 Mar 2003 00:04:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 00:04:54 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18pzvR-0003Vt-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 16:04:53 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18pztE-0003UQ-00; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 16:02:36 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 03 Mar 2003 16:02:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.intrex.net ([209.42.192.250]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18pzss-0003OT-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 16:02:14 -0800 Received: from craig [209.42.200.67] by smtp.intrex.net (SMTPD32-7.13) id ACD7998A0148; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 19:01:27 -0500 To: Subject: [lojban] Re: The Any thread Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:01:50 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3E63EABC.4090705@bilkent.edu.tr> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Declude-Sender: ragnarok@pobox.com [209.42.200.67] X-archive-position: 4315 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ragnarok@pobox.com Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: "Craig" Reply-To: ragnarok@pobox.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382 X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl >> No it isn't. mi nitcu lo mikce == Ex(Mx & Nmx). >Sorry, but I don't understand that. Can anyone put it into predicate >logic for me? I don't speak logic, but I glorked it as something vaguely like: There exists an x such that ([x Mikce] and [m {mi?} Nitcu x]