From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Mar 05 13:04:28 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_1); 5 Mar 2003 21:04:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 5220 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2003 21:04:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Mar 2003 21:04:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Mar 2003 21:04:28 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18qg3w-0003xN-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 05 Mar 2003 13:04:28 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18qg3i-0003x3-00; Wed, 05 Mar 2003 13:04:14 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 05 Mar 2003 13:04:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18qg3O-0003ws-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2003 13:03:54 -0800
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 13:03:54 -0800
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Proper usage of jbovlaste.
Message-ID: <20030305210354.GH8435@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20030305205450.GG8435@digitalkingdom.org> <20030305155618.G88738-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030305155618.G88738-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
X-archive-position: 4363
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

The idea of expressing enjoyment of having monkeys in one's pants as an
offical example for *la'edi'u*, of all things, seemed innapropriate.

Smuggling had nothing to do with it.

I don't see how you can *not* find a sexual connotation in the idea of
enjoying having a monkey in one's pants.

Note, for the record, that I am doing this because I feel it is
appropriate given my LLG-appointed position in the jbovlaste project,
not because I personally give even the *slightest* kalci.

-Robin

On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 03:56:58PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> I thought you had read some sexual connotation into the phrase. The idea
> of smuggling monkeys offends your sense of decorum, does it?
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 03:44:26PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> > > On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > >
> > > > Someone posted the following as an example of la'edi'u:
> > > >
> > > > .i le smani cu nenri le mi palku .i la'edi'u pluka mi
> > > >
> > > > This system is going to be used to produce the official dictionary. Try
> > > > to maintain *some* decorum.
> > > >
> > > > The example has been deleted. If that bothers you, talk to Nick, not
> > > > me; he heads the byfy and has assigned me to handle jbovlaste issues.
> > >
> > > There was a recent case of someone trying to smuggle monkeys through
> > > customs in their pants. Perhaps that's what the writer had in mind.
> >
> > I have no idea why that would change anything.
> >
> > -Robin
> >
> >
> 
> -- 
> What would Jesus bomb?
> 
> 
> 

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
.i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu
.i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai
http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi




