Subject: [lojban] Re: use of mabla

From: "Craig" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 17:23:33 -0500

>> Is defining:
>>
>> malnitcu : x1 is addicted to x2, having dependancy of type x3
>> (physical/psychological/sociological etc.)
>>
>> correct use of mabla?

I see nothing worng with it. However, I would find it counterintuitive - Iff
malnitcu had not previously been defined, I would guess its meaning at "that
darn needer!" or some such. But, giving it a different definition is
perfectly fine, and 'addict' seems to fit.

>It's not an incorrect use.

Double negative! Breee! Breee! Breee!