From ragnarok@pobox.com Sun Mar 09 14:24:24 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_1); 9 Mar 2003 22:24:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 48660 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2003 22:24:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Mar 2003 22:24:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Mar 2003 22:24:23 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18s9DT-00069f-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 09 Mar 2003 14:24:23 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18s9DJ-00069L-00; Sun, 09 Mar 2003 14:24:13 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 09 Mar 2003 14:24:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.intrex.net ([209.42.192.250])
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18s9DC-00069A-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2003 14:24:06 -0800
Received: from craig [209.42.200.67] by smtp.intrex.net
  (SMTPD32-7.13) id AEE537C30264; Sun, 09 Mar 2003 17:23:33 -0500
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
Subject: [lojban] Re: use of mabla
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 17:23:33 -0500
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFOEGKDBAA.ragnarok@pobox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <20030309162832.N42638-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Declude-Sender: ragnarok@pobox.com [209.42.200.67]
X-archive-position: 4412
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: ragnarok@pobox.com
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
Reply-To: ragnarok@pobox.com
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382
X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl

>> Is defining:
>>
>> malnitcu : x1 is addicted to x2, having dependancy of type x3
>> (physical/psychological/sociological etc.)
>>
>> correct use of mabla?

I see nothing worng with it. However, I would find it counterintuitive - Iff
malnitcu had not previously been defined, I would guess its meaning at "that
darn needer!" or some such. But, giving it a different definition is
perfectly fine, and 'addict' seems to fit.

>It's not an incorrect use.

Double negative! Breee! Breee! Breee!





