From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Mar 10 14:42:49 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_1); 10 Mar 2003 22:42:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 67637 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2003 22:42:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Mar 2003 22:42:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Mar 2003 22:42:49 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18sVyo-0004SR-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:42:46 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18sVyV-0004Rx-00; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:42:27 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:42:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fort-point-station.mit.edu ([18.7.7.76])
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18sVy4-0004Rj-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:42:00 -0800
Received: from central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (CENTRAL-CITY-CARRIER-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.72])
  by fort-point-station.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA25980
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 17:41:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (MELBOURNE-CITY-STREET.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.86])
  by central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA23294
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 17:41:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from torg.mit.edu (RANDOM-THREE-NINETY-SIX.MIT.EDU [18.243.6.141])
  )
  by melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h2AMfw0x024193
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 17:41:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rob by torg.mit.edu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
  id 18sVy1-0000vX-00
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 17:41:57 -0500
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 17:41:57 -0500
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: use of mabla
Message-ID: <20030310224157.GA3547@mit.edu>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20030309162832.N42638-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFOEGKDBAA.ragnarok@pobox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFOEGKDBAA.ragnarok@pobox.com>
X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
X-archive-position: 4417
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rspeer@MIT.EDU
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Rob Speer <rspeer@MIT.EDU>
From: Rob Speer <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rspeer@MIT.EDU
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 05:23:33PM -0500, Craig wrote:
> I see nothing worng with it. However, I would find it counterintuitive - Iff
> malnitcu had not previously been defined, I would guess its meaning at "that
> darn needer!" or some such. But, giving it a different definition is
> perfectly fine, and 'addict' seems to fit.

I don't see anything counterintuitive about it. I wouldn't read
"malbroda" as "darn broda", but "mabla broda" could be read that way.

Since it's "malnitcu" being defined and not "mabla nitcu", I think it's
a perfectly good definition.

-- 
mu'o mi'e rab.spir





