From ragnarok@pobox.com Tue Mar 11 11:00:25 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: ragnarok@pobox.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_1); 11 Mar 2003 19:00:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 68792 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2003 19:00:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Mar 2003 19:00:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Mar 2003 19:00:25 -0000 Received: from craig [209.42.200.67] by smtp.intrex.net (SMTPD32-7.13) id A250149F01EC; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:00:32 -0500 To: Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: [lojban.org #92] Re: Your lujvo records in Jbovlaste Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:00:26 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20030311184941.GI5580@digitalkingdom.org> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Declude-Sender: ragnarok@pobox.com [209.42.200.67] From: "Craig" X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382 X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl >> > >The lujvo definitions you are making in Jbovlaste are not according >> > >to standard. >> > > >> > >See http://www.lojban.org/jbovlaste/help/definitions.html >> > > >> > >The short version is that instead of x1, x2, etc., one uses place >> > >designators on the basis of the first letter(s) of the constituent >> > >gismu/cmavo. >> > >> > That standard doesn't work. You have no way of telling which order >> > the arguments are in the lujvo. You can't just assume order of >> > appearance, because sometimes the definition needs to have them in a >> > different order than the lujvo. >Umm, where did you get all that text that you're replying to? I'd like >to be in on whatever discussion that was. Oddly, I didn't even get the reply you were replying to.