From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Mar 12 00:10:48 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_1); 12 Mar 2003 08:10:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 52168 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2003 08:10:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 12 Mar 2003 08:10:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2003 08:10:48 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18t1K3-0001KC-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:10:47 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18t1Jq-0001Js-00; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:10:34 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:10:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18t1JO-0001JX-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:10:06 -0800 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:10:06 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: [lojban.org #92] Re: Your lujvo records in Jbovlaste Message-ID: <20030312081006.GB3482@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030311190322.GB6737@mit.edu> <200303111920.OAA23808@mail.reutershealth.com> <20030311222917.GA7453@mit.edu> <20030311223351.GJ13903@digitalkingdom.org> <20030312075655.GA9346@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030312075655.GA9346@mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-archive-position: 4445 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:56:55AM -0500, Rob Speer wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 02:33:53PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > Because I suspect LaTeX won't render it *nearly* as nicely in the > > printed output. > > What, a colon doesn't look as nice as an equals sign? That's all? > > Pick whatever symbol you want that will look nice. I'm just saying you > shouldn't use = for two purposes. It'll make it hard to read. Well, there's also the 10 years of tradition... If Nick, as bpfk dude, wants to mandate a change, he's welcome to. Until then, I'm sticking with the established standard. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi