From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Mar 12 01:31:52 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_1); 12 Mar 2003 09:31:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 73617 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2003 09:31:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 12 Mar 2003 09:31:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2003 09:31:51 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18t2aV-00021c-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 01:31:51 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18t2aN-00021H-00; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 01:31:43 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 12 Mar 2003 01:31:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu ([18.7.21.83]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18t2a8-00020y-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 01:31:28 -0800 Received: from central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (CENTRAL-CITY-CARRIER-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.72]) by pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id EAA20590 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 04:31:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (MELBOURNE-CITY-STREET.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.86]) by central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id EAA06722 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 04:27:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from torg.mit.edu (RANDOM-THREE-NINETY-SIX.MIT.EDU [18.243.6.141]) ) by melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h2C9RF0x015390 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 04:27:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from rob by torg.mit.edu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18t2W2-0002W7-00 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 04:27:14 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 04:27:14 -0500 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: [lojban.org #92] Re: Your lujvo records in Jbovlaste Message-ID: <20030312092714.GA9635@mit.edu> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030311190322.GB6737@mit.edu> <200303111920.OAA23808@mail.reutershealth.com> <20030311222917.GA7453@mit.edu> <20030311223351.GJ13903@digitalkingdom.org> <20030312075655.GA9346@mit.edu> <20030312081006.GB3482@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030312081006.GB3482@digitalkingdom.org> X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-archive-position: 4447 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rspeer@MIT.EDU Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Rob Speer From: Rob Speer Reply-To: rspeer@MIT.EDU X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 12:10:06AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > Well, there's also the 10 years of tradition... Someone's misunderstanding someone here. Of course you should keep using = between places of the lujvo components that are combined into the same place in the lujvo's place structure. What I'm against is the new notation, which I'm fairly sure was just suggested a couple of days ago, where you can define the places of the lujvo out of order using something like "x1=". I think, since that's not at all doing the same thing as "b1=c1", it should be a different symbol. -- mu'o mi'e rab.spir