From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Mar 12 01:48:19 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_1); 12 Mar 2003 09:48:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 63312 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2003 09:48:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 12 Mar 2003 09:48:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2003 09:48:18 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18t2qQ-000265-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 01:48:18 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18t2qK-00025m-00; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 01:48:12 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 12 Mar 2003 01:48:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail0.epfl.ch ([128.178.50.57]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 18t2qC-00025Z-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 01:48:04 -0800 Received: (qmail 11325 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2003 09:48:02 -0000 Received: from icin2pc65.epfl.ch (HELO ICIN2PC65W) (128.178.158.165) by mail0.epfl.ch with SMTP; 12 Mar 2003 09:48:02 -0000 Message-ID: <005c01c2e87c$78e3a9d0$a59eb280@ic.intranet.epfl.ch> To: References: <20030311190322.GB6737@mit.edu> <200303111920.OAA23808@mail.reutershealth.com> <20030311222917.GA7453@mit.edu> <20030311223351.GJ13903@digitalkingdom.org> <20030312075655.GA9346@mit.edu> <20030312081006.GB3482@digitalkingdom.org> <20030312092714.GA9635@mit.edu> Subject: [lojban] Re: [lojban.org #92] Re: Your lujvo records in Jbovlaste Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:48:02 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-archive-position: 4448 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: gregory.dyke@epfl.ch Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: "Gregory Dyke" From: "Gregory Dyke" Reply-To: gregory.dyke@epfl.ch X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 12:10:06AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > Well, there's also the 10 years of tradition... > > Someone's misunderstanding someone here. > > Of course you should keep using = between places of the lujvo components > that are combined into the same place in the lujvo's place structure. > > What I'm against is the new notation, which I'm fairly sure was just > suggested a couple of days ago, where you can define the places of the > lujvo out of order using something like "x1=". I think, since that's not > at all doing the same thing as "b1=c1", it should be a different symbol. > > -- > mu'o mi'e rab.spir > > This is not likely to be new notation (although frankly I would'nt know): I assume that lujvo such as "selbroda" have been defined in the past (as agreed with And on the wiki, selbroda *should* have some reason for being, ie selbroda /= se broda). The notation must have been: x1=b2 .... x2=b1 I don't really feel this looks any better than x1:b2. Greg