From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Mar 12 09:50:51 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_1); 12 Mar 2003 17:50:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 64121 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2003 17:50:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 12 Mar 2003 17:50:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2003 17:50:49 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18tANL-0005fY-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:50:47 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18tAN6-0005fE-00; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:50:32 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:50:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18tAMt-0005ez-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:50:19 -0800 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:50:19 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: [lojban.org #92] Re: Your lujvo records in Jbovlaste Message-ID: <20030312175019.GD3482@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030311190322.GB6737@mit.edu> <200303111920.OAA23808@mail.reutershealth.com> <20030311222917.GA7453@mit.edu> <20030311223351.GJ13903@digitalkingdom.org> <20030312075655.GA9346@mit.edu> <20030312081006.GB3482@digitalkingdom.org> <20030312092714.GA9635@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030312092714.GA9635@mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-archive-position: 4449 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:27:14AM -0500, Rob Speer wrote: > What I'm against is the new notation, which I'm fairly sure was just > suggested a couple of days ago, where you can define the places of the > lujvo out of order using something like "x1=". I think, since that's > not at all doing the same thing as "b1=c1", it should be a different > symbol. John Cowan seemed to recognize it. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi