From jjllambias@hotmail.com Thu Mar 13 06:36:47 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_1); 13 Mar 2003 14:36:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 38792 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2003 14:36:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Mar 2003 14:36:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n17.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.72) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2003 14:36:46 -0000 Received: from [66.218.67.145] by n17.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Mar 2003 14:36:46 -0000 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 14:36:46 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: [lojban.org #92] Re: Your lujvo records in Jbovlaste Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20030312175019.GD3482@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 479 X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster From: "jjllambias2000" X-Originating-IP: 200.49.74.2 X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 The initials convention is very useful for lujvo makers in order to understand how each component of the lujvo contributes to its overall meaning, but it does not look nice in a dictionary. I would prefer that the definitions of lujvo look just like the definitions of gismu. The nitty-gritty of how the lujvo was constructed should be recorded, but it should not be part of the final presentation, in my opinion. It makes lujvo definitions look weird. mu'o mi'e xorxes