From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Mar 13 10:03:42 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_1); 13 Mar 2003 18:03:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 66083 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2003 18:03:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Mar 2003 18:03:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2003 18:03:42 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18tX3N-00080T-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:03:41 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18tX35-000807-00; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:03:23 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:03:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18tX2j-0007zt-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:03:01 -0800 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:03:01 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: spofu skami Message-ID: <20030313180301.GB25165@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030313083703.GY25165@digitalkingdom.org> <20030313095619.K84347-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030313095619.K84347-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-archive-position: 4465 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 09:57:03AM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote: > On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:35:05AM +0200, robin wrote: > > > Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >Therefore you are not able to nervely-get Valfendi. (I really > > > >dislike the metaphoric usage of nirna being in the gismu list). > > > > > > I don't think the problem is in the meaning, but in the phrasing > > > of the definition. I think of a nirna as being some kind of > > > communication strand, whether it be biological or electronic. But > > > maybe I'm just rationalising here. > > > > I would be completely fine with that, if it matched the basic > > definition. > > > It is part of the basic definition. The definition is not "nerve"; > that's a logflash mnemonic. x1 is a nerve/neuron [body-part] of x2 Note the words 'nerve', 'neuron', and 'body-part'. Perhaps you're talking about a different definition? -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi