From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Mar 13 10:10:56 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_1); 13 Mar 2003 18:10:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 43590 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2003 18:10:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Mar 2003 18:10:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2003 18:10:55 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18tXAN-00082z-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:10:55 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18tXAI-00082c-00; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:10:50 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:10:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18tXAA-00082Q-00; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:10:42 -0800 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:10:42 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Cc: Bob Le Chevalier , Nick Nicholas Subject: [lojban] Re: [lojban.org #92] Re: Your lujvo records in Jbovlaste Message-ID: <20030313181041.GC25165@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org, Bob Le Chevalier , Nick Nicholas References: <20030312175019.GD3482@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-archive-position: 4466 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 02:36:46PM -0000, jjllambias2000 wrote: > The initials convention is very useful for lujvo makers in order to > understand how each component of the lujvo contributes to its overall > meaning, but it does not look nice in a dictionary. I disagree quite a bit, actually. I like knowing where lujvo places come from very much, and it takes up very little extra space. However, the dictionary output format is not fixed, and the final arbiter, at this point, is Nick, although I'm sure Bob could overrule him. I'd like to hear from both of them on this issue. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi