From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Mar 13 10:38:52 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_1); 13 Mar 2003 18:38:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 34590 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2003 18:38:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Mar 2003 18:38:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2003 18:38:43 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18tXbH-0008Uv-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:38:43 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18tXb5-0008Tv-00; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:38:31 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:38:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18tXax-0008Tk-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:38:23 -0800
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:38:23 -0800
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: spofu skami
Message-ID: <20030313183823.GH25165@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20030313181651.GD25165@digitalkingdom.org> <20030313132058.L85179-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030313132058.L85179-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
X-archive-position: 4479
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 01:22:54PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> 'nirna' means things that neuron, or are neuron-like or that do what
> neurons do, which isn't restricted to Neurons. It seems that Neurons
> can go into nirna x1, but there are lo nirna that aren't Neurons.

neuron: 

1. Has dozens, sometimes hundreds of connections to other neurons.

2. Collates inbound data as an aggregate to decide whether to send
outbound data.

3. Has a wide range of physical shapes, but generally consists of a
bundle of goo attached to a long rod of goo with some feelers off the
end of the rod.

4. Conists mostly of carbon, with some nitrogen, oxygen, and other
trace elements.

I believe those are all the major necessary and sufficient features of a
neuron.

Not a *SINGLE* *ONE* of those points applies to an ethernet cable, a
fiber optice cable, a small number of networked computers, or a sigle
computer data switch.

NONE OF THEM. NOT ONE.

You could argue that point #1 matches a sufficiently large group of
computer switches, but that's *it*.

Neurons pass data in a way that is *fundamentally* different from every
network structure that humans have ever built, unless you count
experimental devices whose sole purpose is to emulate neurons.

They are not compatible in any way, and if you think they are, I'd say
the burden of proof is on you.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
.i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu
.i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai
http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi




