From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Mar 16 12:02:55 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_1); 16 Mar 2003 20:02:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 28030 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2003 20:02:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 16 Mar 2003 20:02:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Mar 2003 20:02:55 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18ueLP-0006d2-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 12:02:55 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18ueLI-0006cf-00; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 12:02:49 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 16 Mar 2003 12:02:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18ueLB-0006cW-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 12:02:41 -0800 Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 12:02:41 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: [lojban.org #92] Re: Your lujvo records in Jbovlaste Message-ID: <20030316200241.GL11275@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <6814DE36-57A3-11D7-8E65-003065D4EC72@optushome.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6814DE36-57A3-11D7-8E65-003065D4EC72@optushome.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-archive-position: 4545 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 10:35:36PM +1100, Nick Nicholas wrote: > Though it is hypocritical of me to say, because I have only spent a > few hours with it, I proclaim unto you that it is vital for Lojbanists > to play with jbovlaste now during development, Too late. Full-on development, except on the dictionary export, is over. If you want to play with it during development, you missed your chance. Sorry. The only thing that might have changed this is if people insisted that that natlang words to lojban words should be a 1-to-many mapping, and as both Nick and lojbab agree that breaking up the polysemy of english words solves that problem, as far as I'm concerned jbovlaste is essentially done. Barry bugfixes of course. > to guarantee that it is usable as a platform to anchor dictionaries > onto, and to forestall any catastrophes when half the word stock is > already in there. jbovlaste=> select count(*) from valsi; count ------- 7796 -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi