From phma@webjockey.net Fri Mar 21 17:24:12 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 22 Mar 2003 01:24:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 49062 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2003 01:24:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Mar 2003 01:24:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Mar 2003 01:24:11 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18wXk3-0005hN-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:24:11 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18wXjt-0005h0-00; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:24:01 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:23:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18wXjm-0005gr-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:23:54 -0800
Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001)
  id 2D8BD4CFD; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 20:23:56 -0500 (EST)
Organization: dis
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: flatfish join sheep and tigers
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 20:23:55 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
References: <200303202200.31763.phma@webjockey.net>
In-Reply-To: <200303202200.31763.phma@webjockey.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200303212023.55869.phma@webjockey.net>
X-archive-position: 4575
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
Reply-To: phma@webjockey.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300

On Thursday 20 March 2003 22:00, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> They can now be the butt of the joke, as I have defined {mlafi'e} as
> follows: f1 is a flatfish of family/genus/species f2, swimming with side m1
> upward or equivalently, has both(us) eyes on side m1.

That brings up a question. Should {polgosu} and {flundero} have the same 
plaice structure?

phma

-- 
.i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do
.ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga




