From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Mar 25 14:12:31 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 25 Mar 2003 22:12:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 70896 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2003 22:12:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Mar 2003 22:12:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2003 22:12:30 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18xwek-0001u3-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:12:30 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18xwec-0001tk-00; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:12:22 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:12:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18xweV-0001tb-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:12:15 -0800
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h2PMKuCG000110
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:20:56 -0600 (CST)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h2PMKuwD000109
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:20:56 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:20:55 -0600
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: za'ure'u ?
Message-ID: <20030325222055.GA99901@allusion.net>
References: <20030325213959.GO3751@digitalkingdom.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030325213959.GO3751@digitalkingdom.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-archive-position: 4618
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 01:39:59PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> Is the usage of "za'ure'u" for "the next time" considered Standard
> Lojban at this point?

No.

It could refer to the 10th time also. Or the time after this one.
Or the 2nd time, which happened to come before this time, which is
the 5th time.

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+gNZHDrrilS51AZ8RAo8QAJwK7sy5t/s0OqO4+Ulg+003CIHGSQCglm6D
d3xq9Mmho1lgfhkSx77LR3I=
=b/DB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ--

