From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Mar 26 23:22:45 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 27 Mar 2003 07:22:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 76740 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2003 07:22:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 27 Mar 2003 07:22:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Mar 2003 07:22:44 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18yRil-0002M5-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 23:22:43 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18yRii-0002Ll-00; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 23:22:40 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 26 Mar 2003 23:22:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18yRib-0002Lc-00; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 23:22:33 -0800 Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 23:22:33 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: za'ure'u ? Message-ID: <20030327072233.GB3751@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030325223156.GA388@allusion.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-archive-position: 4633 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:26:01PM -0000, jjllambias2000 wrote: > la djorden cusku di'e > > > > It could refer to the 10th time also. Or the time after > > > > this one. Or the 2nd time, which happened to come before > > > > this time, which is the 5th time. > > No, it is always "this" time, the one we are talking about. It may > be the tenth, the second or the fifth. It may be any one but the > first. All we are saying is that something happens and "not for > the first time". That seems to me to be close enough to "again". Oh! Jordan, comments? -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi