From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Mar 27 16:56:34 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 28 Mar 2003 00:56:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 72386 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2003 00:56:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Mar 2003 00:56:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Mar 2003 00:56:33 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 18yiAb-0005OI-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:56:33 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18yiAS-0005Nz-00; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:56:24 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:56:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lakemtao01.cox.net ([68.1.17.244])
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 18yiAK-0005Nq-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:56:16 -0800
Received: from nora.lojban.org ([68.100.92.1]) by lakemtao01.cox.net
  (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP
  id <20030328005546.LWGZ14921.lakemtao01.cox.net@nora.lojban.org>
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 19:55:46 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20030327194600.02e3cc30@pop.east.cox.net>
X-Sender: noras@pop.east.cox.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 19:48:46 -0500
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: lojban word wrapping.
In-Reply-To: <b5viks+74q6@eGroups.com>
References: <20030327072007.GA3751@digitalkingdom.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-archive-position: 4660
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: noras@lojban.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Nora LeChevalier <noras@lojban.org>
From: Nora LeChevalier <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: noras@lojban.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

At 07:15 PM 3/27/03 +0000, xorxes wrote:
>--- In lojban@yahoogroups.com, Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@l...>
>wrote:
> > Is there anything particularily wrong with using "-" at the end of a
> > line, as in English, to break up words so text can be properly
> > justified?
>
>I don't see a problem, though you'd have to use different rules
>than in English. Something like this:
>
>- cmavo and gismu don't break.
>- cmavo clusters break but are not marked.
>- lujvo break at rafsi boundaries, with y and r glue kept with
> the first part: pavy-sel-jirna, fa'or-ma'o.
>- fu'ivla ???
>- names ???
>
>mu'o mi'e xorxes

While I have no real opinion abou-
t whether it *ought* to be allowe-
d, if it is then there is no reason to have any ru-
les about where the break can occur.

As long as it is marked that the next line continues the same word, it can 
be anywhere.


-- 
mi'e noras noras@lojban.org
Nora LeChevalier





