From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Apr 03 10:11:01 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 3 Apr 2003 18:11:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 70559 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2003 18:11:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Apr 2003 18:11:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2003 18:11:00 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 1919Ax-0003lU-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 03 Apr 2003 10:10:59 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 1919At-0003kz-00; Thu, 03 Apr 2003 10:10:55 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 03 Apr 2003 10:10:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 1919Ak-0003km-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2003 10:10:46 -0800
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 10:10:46 -0800
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Jbovlaste formatting
Message-ID: <20030403181046.GU15380@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <1049203317.3e8992752c8f6@imapwww.epfl.ch> <200304010856.45886.phma@webjockey.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200304010856.45886.phma@webjockey.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-archive-position: 4718
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 08:56:45AM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 April 2003 08:21, greg wrote:
> li'o
> > 4) Should all english verbs have a "to" in front (robin created "exit" and
> > "to exit")?
> 
> No. The lexical form is the infinitive without "to".

Which one's the infinitive?

> > 5)how should exit the verb be separated from exit the noun? we
> > currently have:
> >
> > exit in the sense of leave
> > exit in the sense of an action
> >
> > and I was thinking of having either:
> >
> > exit; action
> > exit; verb
> >
> > (how does this work when we don't have a convenient synonym?)
> 
> I think it should be:
> exit; leave
> exit; act of leaving

What's the difference?

> exit; door
> but for words that just have one noun sense and one verb sense,
> otherwise meaning the same, distinguish them as "noun" and "verb".

<nod>

Some people seem to not like that, I've noticed.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
.i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu
.i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai
http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi




