From xod@thestonecutters.net Fri Apr 04 07:31:01 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 4 Apr 2003 15:31:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 53422 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2003 15:31:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 Apr 2003 15:30:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2003 15:30:59 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 191T9f-0005qo-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 04 Apr 2003 07:30:59 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 191T9K-0005pa-00; Fri, 04 Apr 2003 07:30:38 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 04 Apr 2003 07:30:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 191T8x-0005kP-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2003 07:30:15 -0800
Received: from granite.thestonecutters.net (localhost.thestonecutters.net [127.0.0.1])
  by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h34FUBa5095731
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:30:11 -0500 (EST)
  (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net)
Received: from localhost (xod@localhost)
  by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) with ESMTP id h34FUB0g095728
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:30:11 -0500 (EST)
  (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net)
X-Authentication-Warning: granite.thestonecutters.net: xod owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:30:11 -0500 (EST)
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: 'Not' and Negation in Lojban (and Other Artificial
  Languages)
In-Reply-To: <12e.272746db.2bbeee5d@aol.com>
Message-ID: <20030404102916.H95645-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-archive-position: 4724
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215
X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple

On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 Jlsperanza@aol.com wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm currently researching H. P. Grice's dictum, in 'Logic and Conversation',
> that there are divergences between 'not' and '~' (Studies in the Way of
> Words, p. 22), and wonder if a specific study has been done on the different
> ways of expressing negation (or translating Latin 'non', or English 'not') in
> the various 'artificial languages', including Lojban. Any lead will be much
> appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
>
> JL
> J L Speranza
> jlsperanza@aol.com


You might like to start at
http://www.lojban.org/publications/reference_grammar/chapter15.html
and feel free to inquire if you have any more questions.



-- 
In an opinion poll conducted in early March by Zogby, 97% of
Saudis said they had an unfavorable opinion of the US.

"I think that underestimates it," said Awardh Badhi, a political
scientist with the Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies.






