From ragnarok@pobox.com Fri Apr 11 20:19:05 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 12 Apr 2003 03:19:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 81811 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2003 03:19:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 12 Apr 2003 03:19:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Apr 2003 03:19:05 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 194BXl-0003Ga-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 20:19:05 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 194BXe-0003G7-00; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 20:18:58 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 11 Apr 2003 20:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.intrex.net ([209.42.192.250])
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 194BXX-0003Fx-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 20:18:51 -0700
Received: from craig [209.42.200.60] by smtp.intrex.net
  (SMTPD32-7.13) id A5829B302A4; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 23:18:26 -0400
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
Subject: [lojban] Re: Cartoon by a conlanger
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 23:18:22 -0400
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFCECIDDAA.ragnarok@pobox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
In-Reply-To: <20030411200759.22bc34d0.rizen@surreality.us>
Importance: Normal
X-Declude-Sender: ragnarok@pobox.com [209.42.200.60]
X-archive-position: 4766
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: ragnarok@pobox.com
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
Reply-To: ragnarok@pobox.com
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382
X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl

>> >> > http://www.langmaker.com/db/cmc_unitedwestan.jpg
>> >>
>> >> Ido-land trying to attack Lojbanistan without even a Langmaker
>> >> mandate?
>>
>> >.ua xlali malspero! zo'o
>>
>> But we got to annex la loglandias first.

>"got" as in the past tense of "get" or "got to" as in "have to"?

In my particular dialect of English, it can only be the former, as the
second would need another auxiliary verb: "we've got to annex". I was
referring to the fact that the cartoon shows Lojbanistan as including the
territory of Loglandia.





