From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Apr 16 03:15:14 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 16 Apr 2003 10:15:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 62702 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2003 10:15:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 16 Apr 2003 10:15:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Apr 2003 10:15:13 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 195jwc-0001DA-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:15:10 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 195jvA-0001Cf-00; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:13:40 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail0.epfl.ch ([128.178.50.57])
  by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 195jsJ-0001C5-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:10:43 -0700
Received: (qmail 16753 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2003 10:10:36 -0000
Received: from icin2pc71.epfl.ch (HELO ICIN2PC71W) (128.178.158.171)
  by mail0.epfl.ch with SMTP; 16 Apr 2003 10:10:36 -0000
Message-ID: <003501c30400$6c9aa0d0$ab9eb280@ic.intranet.epfl.ch>
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
References: <b7j7el+3fhn@eGroups.com>
Subject: [lojban] Re: mi'e
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:10:36 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-archive-position: 4792
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: gregory.dyke@epfl.ch
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: "Gregory Dyke" <gregory.dyke@epfl.ch>
From: "Gregory Dyke" <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: gregory.dyke@epfl.ch
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out



> It was parsed by jbofi'e, but with wrong semantics. Of course,
> {nu facki} needs {le} in front of it! And it seems {segugdrkoria}
> is not recognized as I intended... Should I say {selgugdrkoria},
> using lujvo {selgugde}?

why using selgugde?

When type 2/3 fu'ivla are constructed, the main idea is to have them
preceded with a semantical category. so gugdrkoria
>
> mi'e sanxiyn.