Subject: [lojban] Re: mi'e

From: "Gregory Dyke" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:10:36 +0200

> It was parsed by jbofi'e, but with wrong semantics. Of course,
> {nu facki} needs {le} in front of it! And it seems {segugdrkoria}
> is not recognized as I intended... Should I say {selgugdrkoria},
> using lujvo {selgugde}?

why using selgugde?

When type 2/3 fu'ivla are constructed, the main idea is to have them
preceded with a semantical category. so gugdrkoria
> mi'e sanxiyn.