From phma@webjockey.net Fri Apr 18 09:10:58 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 18 Apr 2003 16:10:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 54726 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2003 16:10:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Apr 2003 16:10:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blackcat.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Apr 2003 16:10:57 -0000 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 529BA3EEF; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 16:10:53 +0000 (UTC) Organization: dis To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: conjunction of quantified bridi Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 12:10:52 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304181210.52866.phma@webjockey.net> From: Pierre Abbat X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 I wrote {ni'o so'a se mlafi'e pa mlana zo'u so'a mlafi'e cu limna fi'o galtu .ijenai pa mlana ro se mlafi'e zo'u go'i} and ran it through jbofi'e, which complained at the second {zo'u}. According to the formal grammar, it appears to have complained correctly. What is the correct way to say this? phma -- .i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do .ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga .icu'u la ma'atman.