From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Fri Apr 18 10:30:49 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 18 Apr 2003 17:30:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 64984 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2003 17:30:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Apr 2003 17:30:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO web20503.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.226.138) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Apr 2003 17:30:48 -0000 Message-ID: <20030418172544.813.qmail@web20503.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.69.2.52] by web20503.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 10:25:44 PDT Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 10:25:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [lojban] conjunction of quantified bridi To: lojban@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: <200304181210.52866.phma@webjockey.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Jorge "Llambías" X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la pier cusku di'e > I wrote {ni'o so'a se mlafi'e pa mlana zo'u so'a mlafi'e cu limna fi'o galtu > .ijenai pa mlana ro se mlafi'e zo'u go'i} and ran it through jbofi'e, which > complained at the second {zo'u}. According to the formal grammar, it appears > to have complained correctly. What is the correct way to say this? {ni'o so'a se mlafi'e pa mlana zo'u so'a mlafi'e cu limna fi'o galtu .ijenai tu'e pa mlana ro se mlafi'e zo'u go'i tu'u} This too is grammatical: {ni'o ge so'a se mlafi'e pa mlana zo'u so'a mlafi'e cu limna fi'o galtu ginai pa mlana ro se mlafi'e zo'u go'i} but I'm not sure where {go'i} takes you in such cases. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo http://search.yahoo.com