From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Apr 18 15:19:26 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 18 Apr 2003 22:19:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 75054 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2003 22:19:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Apr 2003 22:19:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Apr 2003 22:19:25 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 196eCb-0001sq-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:19:25 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 196eCW-0001sS-00; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:19:20 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:19:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr ([139.179.30.24])
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 196eCN-0001sI-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:19:11 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBFE32286
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 01:18:38 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from bilkent.edu.tr (ppp110.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr [139.179.111.110])
  by manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F923227A
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 01:18:36 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <3EA0DCFD.8080803@bilkent.edu.tr>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 01:22:05 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030313
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: ynai
References: <200304181207.22479.phma@webjockey.net> <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFIEHMDDAA.ragnarok@pobox.com> <20030418201816.GB16622@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20030418201816.GB16622@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020531
X-archive-position: 4841
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: robin@bilkent.edu.tr
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: "robin.bcc" <robin@bilkent.edu.tr>
From: "robin.bcc" <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: robin@bilkent.edu.tr
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

Rob Speer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 12:41:37PM -0400, Craig wrote:
> 
>>>{mi viska le bloti y nai} is grammatical according to jbofi'e, but {mi
>>
>>viska
>>
>>>le bloti nai} is not. Is it correct?
>>
>>The nai bonds to the y. NAI never bond to a word other than the immediately
>>preceeding one. Thus, mi viska le bloti ynai means "I see the boat (and I
>>don't hesitate to say so)" whereas mi viska le bloti nai is ungramatical. I
>>have been unable to find Y being negated in this way in any real use,
>>however.
> 
> 
> That's icky. Saying "uh" should not change the grammar of the sentence.
> It should be pre-parsed out like word+SI.
> 

".y" is in selma'o Y, not UI - can it really be negated?

robin.tr

-- 
"A Perl script is "correct" if it gets the job done before your boss 
fires you."
- Larry Wall

Robin Turner
IDMYO
Bilkent Univeritesi
Ankara 06533
Turkey

www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin






