From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Apr 18 15:20:54 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 18 Apr 2003 22:20:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 67935 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2003 22:20:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Apr 2003 22:20:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Apr 2003 22:20:54 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
  id 196eE2-0001us-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:20:54 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 196eDz-0001uZ-00; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:20:51 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
  id 196eDq-0001uP-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:20:42 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h3IMVYsr006513
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 17:31:34 -0500 (CDT)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.3/Submit) id h3IMVY1f006512
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 17:31:34 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 17:31:34 -0500
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Y+NAI is not grammatical; jbofi'e is not always right (was Re: ynai)
Message-ID: <20030418223134.GA6392@allusion.net>
References: <20030418201816.GB16622@mit.edu> <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFCEIADDAA.ragnarok@pobox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFCEIADDAA.ragnarok@pobox.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-archive-position: 4842
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 06:10:29PM -0400, Craig wrote:
> >> >{mi viska le bloti y nai} is grammatical according to jbofi'e, but {m=
i
> >> viska
> >> >le bloti nai} is not. Is it correct?
> >>
> >> The nai bonds to the y. NAI never bond to a word other than the
> immediately
> >> preceeding one. Thus, mi viska le bloti ynai means "I see the boat (an=
d I
> >> don't hesitate to say so)" whereas mi viska le bloti nai is ungramatic=
al.
> I
> >> have been unable to find Y being negated in this way in any real use,
> >> however.
>=20
> >That's icky. Saying "uh" should not change the grammar of the sentence.
> >It should be pre-parsed out like word+SI.
>=20
> The ickiness of ynai is probably responsible for its complete lack of use=
.
> As NAI shepherd on the BPFK, I have looked for that particular compound
> before, and it does not seem to exist. Aside from being in the grammar (a=
t
> least jbofi'e thinks so; I can't read BNF), there is nothing in the basel=
ine
> at present telling us that ynai should be grammatical. My interpretation
> that the nai bonds to the y is based on the fact that in every single oth=
er
> use, nai bonds to the word right before it.

Looking at the BNF, it doesn't look like it should be grammatical:

indicator:	(UI | CAI) [NAI] | Y | DAhO | FUhO

and the informal rules

word:	[BAhE] any-word [indicators]
any-word	: "any single word (no compound cmavo)"

are the relevant parts. The Y rule doesn't support NAI, so I think
the author of jbofi'e probably cheated and implemented Y as a UI
for easiness.

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+oHzGDrrilS51AZ8RAlPyAKCjtxSg1hehN6g7/cZ+h2DUKu0uBQCgqN3W
/2KaNtXpMYPC4VkCM5aDa5I=
=BfWx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE--

