From phma@webjockey.net Fri Apr 18 15:40:02 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 18 Apr 2003 22:40:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 66383 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2003 22:40:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Apr 2003 22:40:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Apr 2003 22:40:00 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 196eWW-00022o-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:40:00 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 196eWN-00022S-00; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:39:51 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:39:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 196eWF-00022I-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:39:43 -0700 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 323E137E5; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 22:39:18 +0000 (UTC) Organization: dis To: Subject: [lojban] Re: ynai Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 18:39:16 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304181839.17563.phma@webjockey.net> X-archive-position: 4845 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Pierre Abbat Reply-To: phma@webjockey.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 On Friday 18 April 2003 18:30, Craig wrote: > >".y" is in selma'o Y, not UI - can it really be negated? > > Y shouldn't be negatable. Y is not negatable in actual usage. The Book does > not mention Y being negatable. Jbofi'e thinks Y is negatable. Jordan tells > me that the BNF disagrees. Hrm, looks like Y is not negatable. What about {mi viska le bloti .ui .y. nai}?