From opoudjis@optushome.com.au Sat Apr 19 06:55:25 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: opoudjis@optushome.com.au X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 19 Apr 2003 13:55:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 22476 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2003 13:55:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 19 Apr 2003 13:55:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail019.syd.optusnet.com.au) (210.49.20.160) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Apr 2003 13:55:23 -0000 Received: from optushome.com.au (c17354.brasd1.vic.optusnet.com.au [210.49.155.214]) by mail019.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3JDtMh11673 for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 23:55:22 +1000 Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 23:55:21 +1000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: BPFK: meta-discussion over there To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <8FFCDD78-726E-11D7-A233-003065D4EC72@optushome.com.au> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) From: Nick Nicholas X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=90350612 X-Yahoo-Profile: opoudjis Folks, metadiscussion of the bpfk still belongs on the phpbb forum. Yes, I've been remissing in following it too (I do have a day job after all. Three, in fact.) And there is a mpd for email notifications which we should be putting in. But really, the discussion belongs there. I suspect I will vehemently disagree with Craig on everything he says on NAI, :-) but he's exactly right in his response to Jordan: if what Craig says about NAI makes you nervous, you've got a vote, use it. And if you've got counterarguments against what he's doing, he's obliged to take them into consideration. Shepherd means person runs discussion, not person decides discussion. ____.____1____.____2____.____3____.____4____.____5____.____6____.____7__ When in doubt, Dr Nick Nicholas, French & Italian Studies, --- DOUBT! nickn@unimelb.edu.au University of (- me) http://www.opoudjis.net Melbourne, Australia