From mathmaniac@hanmail.net Mon Apr 21 01:10:25 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: mathmaniac@hanmail.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 21 Apr 2003 08:10:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 91814 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2003 08:10:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 21 Apr 2003 08:10:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n12.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.67) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Apr 2003 08:10:25 -0000 Received: from [66.218.67.165] by n12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Apr 2003 08:10:24 -0000 Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 08:10:24 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Quoting "zoi" Message-ID: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 524 X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster From: "sshiskom" X-Originating-IP: 143.248.205.98 X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122399845 X-Yahoo-Profile: sshiskom On IRC, I tried to quote the word {zoi} and wrote {zo zoi}. Surprisingly, jbofi'e didn't parse it. So I checked Reference Grammar, and it seems ZOI takes precedence over ZO. Is there any reason for this? It makes quoting the word {zoi} difficult -- I am obliged to say {zoi gy. zoi .gy} or something like that. On the other hand, if ZO takes precedence over ZOI, the word {zo} would be {zo zo} and the word {zoi} would be {zo zoi}. I see no disadvantage and one advantage of this idea over current baseline. mi'e sanxiyn.